yourDNAportalforum

Then we can get into the whole is "phenotype is not genotype" debate. But you guys are better at that than myself. I tend to think that yes there is more Asiatic in Europeans due to Turkic, Mongol, Hun, invasions than what is being said today. I myself have more that "Charles Bronson" look from my ...

ANyways, that was my ancestral results. Deep ancestral are 85% west eurasian, 7% east eurasian, 5% siberian-american, 1,5% W-african and 1,5% E-african. ANyway, is there anything special about these results? Which ones should i rely more on? Ancestral or deep ancestral? I believe Ancestral would be...

ANyways, that was my ancestral results.

Deep ancestral are 85% west eurasian, 7% east eurasian, 5% siberian-american, 1,5% W-african and 1,5% E-african.


ANyway, is there anything special about these results? Which ones should i rely more on? Ancestral or deep ancestral?

Well, here are my results:

77,7% West eurasian, 13,4% East eurasian and 8,9% siberian-american.

Rest is 0% entirely.

Didnt expect to be so non-caucasiod. I mean, i do get like around 13% aasi(14,7% SI on harappaworld and like 85% of it should be east eurasian) + 2% mong.

Before im going to take one too, im just wondering what the west eurasian component is?
And is it going to be the same for all "caucasiods"? Because my caucasiod is VERY different to european version of caucasiod

Some herati(west afghan): Harrappaworld: Admix Results (sorted): # Population Percent 1 Baloch 32.98 2 Caucasian 25.33 3 NE-Euro 12.38 4 S-Indian 7.97 5 SW-Asian 5.7 6 Mediterranean 4.16 7 Siberian 2.93 8 NE-Asian 2.07 9 American 1.73 10 SE-Asian 1.51 11 Beringian 1.42 12 Papuan 0.83 13 W-African 0....

nice